Staggering the Board
Electing the Board of Directors
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is Staggering the Election of the Board of Directors?
The default rule calls for the election of each director, each year. This situation can be an administrative burden, as holding an election generally requires extensive notice with regard to eachopen positionand arrangement of a meeting to elect the directors.
In order to maintain some level of continuity year after year and avoid some of the administrative burden, corporations will often stagger their voting over a two or three year period.
This means that either 1/2 or 1/3 of the directors will come up for election on any given year. In practical terms this limits the ability of a majority shareholder to completely change the board out in any given year.
Since the election of directors takes place over multiple years, it will at least take two years to completely change the board of directors.
Back To: BUSINESS ENTITIES, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, & OWNERSHIP