Ricardian Equivalence - Explained
What is the Ricardian Equivalence?
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Courses
What is the Ricardian Equivalence?
The Ricardian Equivalence is an economic proposition that holds that when there is increased debt-financed spending by the government in order to stimulate the economy, demands remain unchanged. Hence, this theory suggests that government deficit or a change in government spending does not cause a change in the overall demand in an economy. David Ricardo, a 19th-century British political economist developed the Ricardian Equivalence theory, this theory was subsequently revised by Robert Barro, a Harvard professor. The Ricardian Equivalence theory is otherwise known as the Barro-Ricardo equivalence proposition.
How is Ricardian Equivalence Used?
The underlying idea behind the Ricardian Equivalence proposition is that regardless of how a government increase spending (either debt-financed or tax-financed spending), demand in the economy remains the same. Both David Ricardo and Robert Barro argued that individual taxpayers and households save heavily in anticipation of government deficit which leads to higher taxes. Since taxpayers are aware that government deficit will be repaid, they use the excess money on their savings to pay for anticipated tax increases, which are subsequently used to repay government debt. The Ricardian Equivalence proposition maintains that a government cannot stimulate consumer spending in sick that when the government increases debt-financed spending, demand by Individuals and households remain the same.
Arguments Against the Ricardian Equivalence
Critics of the Ricardian Equivalence proposition argue that the proposition is premised on unrealistic assumptions. Some of the unrealistic assumptions of the Ricardian Equivalence include the existence of a perfect capital market where individuals and households can save excess money as they wish and also borrow whenever they want to. Another argument against the proposition is that oftentimes, individuals do not save an excess amount in anticipation of tax increase or heftier tax responsibilities. According to the critics of this proposition, Ricardo's theory is against the Keynesian economics theories.
Example of the Ricardian Equivalence
The Ricardian Equivalence theory proposes that the effect of government spending on consumer spending and demands is always the sadness, whether the pattern of government spending changes or not. For instance, individuals in a given economy save an excessive amount of money in expectation of bigger tax payments in the future to help the government offset debts. Since individuals already put aside enough money to cushion tax increase, their demand or spending is not affected by government spending.
Related Topics
- What is Government Spending?
- Autonomous Spending
- Autonomous Consumption
- Fiscal Policy
- Expansionary Fiscal Policy
- Contractionary Fiscal Policy
- Progressive vs Regressive Tax
- Marginal Tax Rates
- Proportional Tax
- Trickle Down Theory
- Discretionary Fiscal Policy
- Automatic Stabilizers
- Effects of Discretionary Policy (Interest Rates & Lags)
- Crowding Out Effect
- National Debt
- Government Borrowing
- Golden Rule
- Ricardian Equivalence
- Balanced Budget - Deficit and Surplus
- National Debt
- Standardized Employment Budget
- Deficit Hawk
- Austerity
- Twin Deficits
- Fiscal Policy and the Aggregate Supply and Demand Curve
- Stabilization Policy
- Robin Hood Effect
- Ricardo Barro Effect
- Automatic Stabilizers
- Standardized Employment Budget
- How Does Fiscal Policy Affect Interest Rates?
- Crowding Out
- Types of Lag in Fiscal Policy
- Temporary and Permanent Fiscal Policy
- Limitations of Fiscal Policy?
- How Politics Affects Discretionary Fiscal Policy
- Government Borrowing
- National Savings and Investment Identity
- Debtor Nation
- Fiscal Policy Affects Trade Balances
- Twin Deficits
- Exchange Rates Affect Budget and Trade Deficits
- What are the risks of chronic large deficits in the United States?
- How Fiscal Policy Can Affect Trade Imbalances
- Government Borrowing Affect Private Savings
- Ricardian Equivalence
- Fiscal Policy Affects Investment and Economic Growth
- Crowding Out of Physical Capital Investment?
- How Does Government Borrowing Affect Interest Rates in Financial Markets?
- Government Investment in Physical Capital
- Public Investment in Human Capital
- Fiscal Policy Can Affect Technology Development
- Economic Cycle or Business Cycle
- Business Cycle Indicator
- Peak and Trough
- Recession and Depression
- Hard Landing vs Soft Landing
- Economic Bubble
- Boom and Bust Cycle
- Great Depression
- Baby Boomer Age Wave Theory
- Skyscrapper Effect (Economics)
- V-Shaped Recovery
- W-Shaped Recovery
- U-Shaped Recovery
- Kondratieff Wave Cycle
- Contagion
- Feedback Rule Policy
- American Customer Satisfaction Index
- CNN Effect
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Business Starts Index
- American Recover and Reinvestment Act
- Abenomics
- Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
- Commodity Credit Corporation
- Humphrey Hawkins Act
- Stagnation
- Neoclassical Growth Theory
- Exogenous Growth Theory
- Endogenous Growth Theory
- New Growth Theory - Explained
- Classical Growth Theory - Explained
- Real Economic Growth Rate - Explained
- Plutonomy