How does Physical Capital Affect Productivity?

Physical capital per person refers to the amount and kind of machinery and equipment available to help people get work done. Compare, for example, your productivity in typing a term paper on a typewriter to working on your laptop with word processing software. Clearly, you will be able to be more productive using word processing software. The technology and level of capital of your laptop and software has increased your productivity. More broadly, the development of GPS technology and Universal Product Codes (those barcodes on every product we buy) has made it much easier for firms to track shipments, tabulate inventories, and sell and distribute products. 

These two technological innovations, and many others, have increased a nation's ability to produce goods and services for a given population. Likewise, increasing human capital involves increasing levels of knowledge, education, and skill sets per person through vocational or higher education. Physical and human capital improvements with technological advances will increase overall productivity and, thus, GDP.

Back to: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & MONETARY POLICY

To see how these improvements have increased productivity and output at the national level, we should examine evidence from the United States. The United States experienced significant growth in the twentieth century due to phenomenal changes in infrastructure, equipment, and technological improvements in physical capital and human capital. The population more than tripled in the twentieth century, from 76 million in 1900 to over 300 million in 2016. The human capital of modern workers is far higher today because the education and skills of workers have risen dramatically. In 1900, only about one-eighth of the U.S. population had completed high school and just one person in 40 had completed a four-year college degree. By 2010, more than 87% of Americans had a high school degree and over 29% had a four-year college degree as well. In 2014, 40% of working-age Americans had a four-year college degree. The average amount of physical capital per worker has grown dramatically. The technology available to modern workers is extraordinarily better than a century ago: cars, airplanes, electrical machinery, smartphones, computers, chemical and biological advances, materials science, health care—the list of technological advances could run on and on. More workers, higher skill levels, larger amounts of physical capital per worker, and amazingly better technology, and potential GDP for the U.S. economy has clearly increased a great deal since 1900.

Related Topics

• Keynesian Perspective of Aggregate Demand
• Recessionary and Inflationary Gap
• Consumption Expenditure
• Investment Expenditure
• Government Spending in Aggregate Demand
• Net Exports in Aggregate Demand
• Keynesian Economic Analysis
• Wage and Price Stickiness 
• Coordination Argument of Wage Stickiness
• What are Menu Costs
• Keynesian Assumptions in the Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply Model
• Macroeconomic Externality
• Expenditure Multiplier
• The Phillips Curve
• Keynesian Approach to Unemployment and Inflation
• Keynesian Perspective on Market Forces
• NeoClassical Economics
• Long Run Potential GDP
• Physical Capital Affects Productivity
• Potential GDP in the Aggregate Demand Aggregate Supply Model
• Prices are Flexible in the Long Run
• Keynesian and NeoClassical View of Long-Run Aggregate Supply and Demand
• Speed of Macroeconomic Adjustment of Wages and Prices
• Paradox of Rationality
• Rational Expectations Theory
• Shapley Value
• Mechanism Design Theory
• What is the Adaptive Expectations Theory
• Measure Inflation Expectations
• Neoclassical Phillips Curve Tradeoff
• Neoclassical View of Unemployment
• Neoclassical View of Recessions
• Keynesian vs Neoclassical Macroeconomic Policy Recommendations