Coordination Argument - Wage Stickiness
What is the Coordination Argument of Wage Stickiness?
Written by J. Mance Gordon
Updated at April 23rd, 2024
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Courses
What is the Coordination Argument of Wage Stickiness?
Keynes emphasized one particular reason why wages were sticky: the coordination argument. This argument points out that, even if most people would be willing—at least hypothetically—to see a decline in their own wages in bad economic times as long as everyone else also experienced such a decline, a market-oriented economy has no obvious way to implement a plan of coordinated wage reductions.
There are a number of reasons why wages might be sticky downward, most of which center on the argument that businesses avoid wage cuts because they may in one way or another depress morale and hurt the productivity of the existing workers.
Some modern economists have argued in a Keynesian spirit that, along with wages, other prices may be sticky, too. Many firms do not change their prices every day or even every month. When a firm considers changing prices, it must consider two sets of costs. First, changing prices uses company resources: managers must analyze the competition and market demand and decide the new prices, they must update sales materials, change billing records, and redo product and price labels. Second, frequent price changes may leave customers confused or angry—especially if they discover that a product now costs more than they expected.
Related Topics
- Keynesian Perspective of Aggregate Demand
- Recessionary and Inflationary Gap
- Consumption Expenditure
- Investment Expenditure
- Government Spending in Aggregate Demand
- Net Exports in Aggregate Demand
- Keynesian Economic Analysis
- Wage and Price Stickiness
- Coordination Argument of Wage Stickiness
- What are Menu Costs
- Keynesian Assumptions in the Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply Model
- Macroeconomic Externality
- Expenditure Multiplier
- The Phillips Curve
- Keynesian Approach to Unemployment and Inflation
- Keynesian Perspective on Market Forces
- NeoClassical Economics
- Long Run Potential GDP
- Physical Capital Affects Productivity
- Potential GDP in the Aggregate Demand Aggregate Supply Model
- Prices are Flexible in the Long Run
- Keynesian and NeoClassical View of Long-Run Aggregate Supply and Demand
- Speed of Macroeconomic Adjustment of Wages and Prices
- Paradox of Rationality
- Rational Expectations Theory
- Shapley Value
- Mechanism Design Theory
- What is the Adaptive Expectations Theory
- Measure Inflation Expectations
- Neoclassical Phillips Curve Tradeoff
- Neoclassical View of Unemployment
- Neoclassical View of Recessions
- Keynesian vs Neoclassical Macroeconomic Policy Recommendations