Civil Liability Under Section 11 of the 1933 Act - Explained
Section 11 Liability - Explained
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is civil liability under Section 11 of the 33 Act?What are the Requirements for Liability Under Section 11?Who is Potentially Liable?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is civil liability under Section 11 of the 33 Act?
Sections 11(a) and (b) of the 33 Act provide for strict liability (tort liability) for issuers who make material misstatements or omissions in the issuance of securities. This provision primarily applies to omissions and errors in disclosure pursuant to a public offerings. For example, an error in a private placement memorandum or registration statement could give rise to Section 11 liability.
Next Article: Section 12 Civil Liability Back to: SECURITIES LAW
What are the Requirements for Liability Under Section 11?
To be liable for a Section 11 violation, the issuer must make a material misstatement or omission of information in the transaction. An individual may be liable if the final registration statement contains any:
- untrue statement of material fact;
- omits material facts required by a statute or government regulation; or
- omits information that makes the stated information materially misleading.
The plaintiff does not have to demonstrate or prove any reliance on the statement. It is sufficient to demonstrate that the information was erroneous or misleading. The limitation is that the purchaser must not know that the information is erroneous or misleading at the time of purchase. Lastly, the securities the plaintiff purchased must be traceable to the registration statement or disclosure document at issue. This requirement is easy to meet in an IPO, but it may be difficult in subsequent purchases of shares issued in private offerings.
Who is Potentially Liable?
The issuer is potentially liable under Section 11. Further, Section 15 makes any person or entity that controls an issuer potentially liable. This provision provides for joint and several liability for the controlling person or entity under agency principles. Liability extends to those who endorse or signe their names (signer) to assert the veracity of the information. This generally leads to potential liability for corporate directors, underwriters, and others who take part in the preparation of the registration statement or prospectus. Any signer has a due diligence defense, though an insider CEO and CFO will have hard time asserting this defense. The due diligence defense regards the amount of effort and care the signer exercised in verifying the erroneous or omitted information. Section 11(e) provides for rescission of the transaction (along with interest) or damages suffered (losses sustained) from the later sale of the securities.
- Liability Under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933
- What is civil liability under Section 11 of the 33 Act?
- What is civil liability under Section 12 of the 33 Act?
- What are defenses available to charges under Sections 11 and 12?
- What is civil liability under Section 17 of the 33 Act?
- What is potential criminal liability under the 33 Act?
What do you think about Section 11 liability for omissions or errors in disclosure? Do you think these provisions adequately make officers accountable for public disclosures? Why or why not?
ABC Corp is going through the registration process. It files the S-1 containing all relevant financial and non-financial information. It also translates this information into a prospectus that it distributes to potential purchasers. What is ABC Corps potential liability if some of the revenue calculations are erroneous in the accompanying financial statements?