Blanket Lien - Explained
What is a Blanket Lien?
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Courses
What is a Blanket Lien?
A blanket lien is a type of lien that gives a lender the legal claim of right in all assets or a group of assets of the debtor. Generally, a blanket liens attempts secure a loan by attaching assets of the debtor as collateral.
Prior to default, a blanket lien is in the form of a security interest. In the event of a debtor default, the lien gives the lender the right to seize and sell the debtors assets. A blanket lien is otherwise called a UCC-1 lien.
Back To: COMMERCIAL LAW: CONTRACTS, PAYMENTS, SECURITY INTERESTS, & BANKRUPTCY
Related Topics
- What is Priority of a security interest?
- What role does perfection play in establishing the Priority of a secured party?
- What are the common conflicts arising as to priority of a security interest?
- What is the priority of parties secured by common law and statutory liens?
- Lien - Definition
- Blanket Lien Definition
- Unperfected Lien
- Possessory Lien
- Non-Possessory Lien
- Tax Lien
- Mechanics Lien Definition
- Construction Lien
- Cloud on Title
- Priority of a buyer of collateral that is subject to a security interest
Academics research on Blanket Lien
- [PDF] Measuring LGD on commercial loans: an 18-year internal study, Araten, M., Jacobs, M., & Varshney, P. (2004). Measuring LGD on commercial loans: an 18-year internal study.RMA JOURNAL,86(8), 96-103.
- Accounts receivable management policy: theory and evidence, Mian, S. L., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1992). Accounts receivable management policy: theory and evidence.The Journal of Finance,47(1), 169-200. This paper develops and tests hypotheses that explain the choice of accounts receivable management policies. The tests focus on both crosssectional explanations of policychoice determinants, as well as incentives to establish captives. We find size, concentration, and credit standing of the firm's traded debt and commercial paper are each important in explaining the use of factoring, accounts receivable secured debt, captive finance subsidiaries, and general corporate credit. We also offer evidence that captive formation allows more flexible financial contracting. However, we find no evidence that captive formation expropriates bondholder wealth.
- Current Techniques for Secured Financing of Negotiated Acquisistions in Mexico, including Analysis of Effective Use of Guarantee Trusts and Pledges without, Caviedes, H. P. G. (2005). Current Techniques for Secured Financing of Negotiated Acquisistions in Mexico, including Analysis of Effective Use of Guarantee Trusts and Pledges without Possession.US-Mex. LJ,13, 71.
- Revolving asset-based lending contracts and the resolution of debt-related agency problems, Constand, R. L., Osteryoung, J. S., & Nast, D. A. (1991). Revolving asset-based lending contracts and the resolution of debt-related agency problems.Journal of Small Business Finance,1(1), 15-28. Small firms that do not have access to organized financial markets must often rely on secured commercial loans for their debt financing. In large firms, debt-related agency problems are often resolved through the bond pricing process in the formal debt markets. When these same debt-related agency problems arise in small, private firms, the structure of the secured lending agreement must resolve these problems. This study identifies debt-related agency problems as they exist in private firms and examines howf the lending agreement resolves these problems.
- Is secured debt efficient, Hill, C. A. (2001). Is secured debt efficient.Tex. L. Rev.,80, 1117.