Priority when making Future Advances to a Debtor - Explained
The Effect on Secured Lenders When Extending Additional Loans to a Debtor
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is a secured partys priority in future advances of funds to the debtor?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is a secured party's priority in future advances of funds to the debtor?
Future advances of funds are funds provided to a debtor based upon an existing lending agreement. This is common when a debtor establishes a line of credit with a lender. The lender will advance funds to the debtor when requested. Generally, a security agreement will provide that the lender is secured by any collateral securing a future advance or new collateral acquired with the advanced funds.
- Relevant Law: Section 9-323 contains the priority rules relating to future advances. Generally, the time of perfection establishes priority with respect to future advances. 9-203, Cmt. 3.
The rules for priority in future advances are as follows:
Time of Perfection - Generally, the time of perfection of a security interest establishes priority with respect to future advances. That is, if a lender makes an advance of funds based upon a prior agreement, the priority of the lenders security interest in collateral securing the advance is determined by the time of the filing of the financing statement covering the collateral. If the debtor has secured creditors with priority above that of the lender, these creditors retain priority in the collateral despite the future advance.
Example: First Bank lends money to Mark and takes a security interest in Marks lawn mower. Mark later borrows money from Second Bank that takes a security interest in all of Marks assets. As such, First Banks security interest in the lawn mower has priority over that of Second Bank. If First Bank makes a future advance to Mark pursuant to the original lending agreement, First Bank will have priority based upon its original security agreement and financing statement. If, however, First Banks security agreement does not cover future advances, Second Banks security interest in the collateral will have priority over a subsequent security interest filed by First Bank against the collateral to secure payment of the future advance.
Priority over Lien Creditors - Per 9-323(b), a secured party that advances additional funds and claims a security interest against the original collateral has priority over a lien creditors of the debtor if:
The secured party made the advance of new credit within 45 days after the lien attaches, or
The secured party made the advance of funds more than 45 days after the lien attaches, but without knowledge of the lien or pursuant to a prior agreement entered into without knowledge of the lien.
Example: First Bank lends money to Katherine and takes a security interest in Katherines jewelry. A creditor receives a judgment against Katherine and establishes a lien against her jewelry. First Bank later makes a future advance to Katherine that is secured by her jewelry. If First Bank made the advance within 45 days of the lien creditor establishing its lien, then First Bank will have priority. If First Bank makes the future advance more than 45 days after the lien is established, it will have priority if the future advance was pursuant to the original lending agreement providing for a security interest in the collateral or if First Bank had no knowledge of the other creditors lien at the time of the advance.
Priority over Buyers of Collateral - Per 9-323(d) and (e), a secured party who makes future advances against collateral has priority over a buyer of the collateral in the ordinary course if:
The secured party's advance is made within 45 days and without knowledge of the purchase; or
The advance was made pursuant to a commitment established within 45 days of and without knowledge of the purchase.
Note: This provision keeps a debtor from selling collateral and then seeking a future advance secured by the collateral.
Example: First Bank has a security interest in ABCs inventory. ABC sells an item of inventory to Fanny. Fanny takes the item subject to First Banks security interest in the inventory if the advance was made within 45 days of the sale or the advance was made pursuant to a security agreement entered into within 45 days and without knowledge of the sale to Fanny.
Next Article: Priority of Purchase Money Security Interest in Collateral Back to: SECURED TRANSACTIONS
- What are the general Priority Rules for Conflicting security interests?
- Subordination Agreement
- Who has Priority in Proceeds from the sale of collateral?
- What is a secured party's priority in future advances to a debtor?
- What is the priority of a PMSI in goods (other than inventory and livestock)?
- What is the priority of a PMSI in inventory?
- What is the priority of conflicting PMSIs?
- What is the priority of security interests in fixtures?
- What is the scope of fixture priority rules?
How do you feel about the rules providing for priority for future advances? Do you agree that with the priority rules for future advances above that of lien creditors? Why or why not? Do you agree that with the priority rules for future advances above that of buyers of the collateral in the ordinary course? Why or why not? Can you think of situations where this rule would unduly prejudice lien creditors or buyers in the ordinary course?
Luther borrows funds from First Bank. First bank establishes a security agreement and perfects a security interest in Luther's tractors. Luther later takes out loans from Second Bank and Third Bank. Both banks establish security agreements in all of Luther's assets. Luther also becomes subject to a lien creditor. Troubled with money issues, Luther sells the tractor without notifying his creditors. Soon thereafter, First Bank makes a future advance to Luther secured by the tractor. Which creditors security interest, if any, has priority in the collateral? What additional information do we need to answer this question?